,@piersmorgan Your opinion is protected, your presence in the U.S. is not. See Kleindienst v. Mandel (1972). http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=408&invol=753 …
Ironic U.S. gun rights campaign to deport me for 'attacking 2nd Amendment rights' - is my opinion not protected under 1st Amendment rights?
-
-
- View other replies
-
@jamestaranto This ludicrous precedent isn't even applicable. I'm pretty sure@piersmorgan is in the U.S. already, and is not a communist.0 retweets 0 likes -
@kylefarq@jamestaranto@piersmorgan Read the whole decision. The good stuff is near the end.0 retweets 0 likes -
@TonyLimaPOL@jamestaranto@piersmorgan Gotta admit, I kinda lost interest. It was so utterly absurd.0 retweets 0 likes -
@kylefarq@jamestaranto@piersmorgan Reading legal opinions requires a high tolerance for both pain and boredom. You’re welcome.0 retweets 0 likes -
@TonyLimaPOL@jamestaranto@piersmorgan That's true. But this is a legal opinion that reflects the context of McCarthyism and insanity.0 retweets 0 likes -
@kylefarq@jamestaranto@piersmorgan In your opinion. Supreme Court opinions >>>>>> yours.0 retweets 0 likes -
@TonyLimaPOL@jamestaranto@piersmorgan Supreme Court opinions have more widespread consequences than my opinions. This is undeniably true.0 retweets 0 likes - View other replies
- Show more
-
-
-
@piersmorgan u love the 1st amendment right to say as u wish and we will keep our guns to protect it@nra6 retweets 7 likes - View other replies
-
@deedeegop@piersmorgan@nra and I am a Republican who voted for Romney but this stance on "citizens need assault rifles" is ludicrous0 retweets 0 likes - View other replies
-
@RealDMurph@deedeegop@piersmorgan@nra Citizens do need assault rifles. We the people are the militia.1 retweet 0 likes - View other replies
-
@pcook60 do not be foolish. The 2nd amendment was established so that citizens could rise against the government if if became oppressive0 retweets 0 likes - View other replies
-
@RealDMurph and also protect the country. The constitution does not allow for a standing army.0 retweets 0 likes - View other replies
-
@pcook60 then back when it was written. We need a standing army and any militia has been rendered completely useless/un necessary0 retweets 0 likes -
@RealDMurph ask the store owners in the LA riots what would have happens to them with out their assault weapons.1 retweet 0 likes - View other replies
-
@pcook60 of LAPD from then to now. I don't doubt that you or 99% of assault weapons owners use them any other way then extremely responsibly0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
-
@piersmorgan I think what people are mad about is that you want to alter our laws, but you are not American. It’s not YOUR battle.0 retweets 0 likes -
-
@kimroen@piersmorgan Is it my responsibility to go over to England and demand something to be done about the chavs? Nope.0 retweets 0 likes -
@MacTheDave@piersmorgan No, but there’s no reason for you not to, either. Caring about people is right, regardless of where you live.0 retweets 0 likes - View other replies
-
@kimroen@piersmorgan History should be taken into account. We are a young nation not all that far removed from fighting for independence.0 retweets 0 likes -
@MacTheDave@piersmorgan I’m not sure how that’s relevant to him as a person and his arguments.0 retweets 0 likes -
@kimroen@piersmorgan This is not his country, he came here to make money. Many of us don’t feel a foreigner should try to dictate our laws.0 retweets 0 likes -
@MacTheDave@piersmorgan He’s participating as a person, not as an Englishman. Again, I don’t see how his nationality is relevant.0 retweets 0 likes - Show more
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Piers Morgan
James Taranto
Kyle Farquharson
Tony Lima
Dee Dee Sorvino
Phil
MacTheDave
Kim Røen