Yesterday, Keir Starmer went on TV & bounced back a question about defunding police by stressing his record as a prosecutor, ‘bringing thousands to court’, & his closeness to police. There wasn’t any indication there might be *anything* wrong with the police or CJS, as he saw it.
-
-
Show this thread
-
(An aside, I doubt KS actually thinks that: his most prominent cases as a young barrister, the police history of the Stephen Lawrence case with which he'd have been familiar given the prosecution during his tenure as DPP, his human rights role with PSNI - all suggest otherwise.)
Show this thread -
It's not an accident. It’s obvious Team Starmer’s reading of the failures of the Corbyn period is that perceived laxness on crime, discipline and discomfort with patriotism spelled electoral disaster. They’re happy to risk ‘overcorrecting’ – ‘where else do they have to go?’ &c.
Show this thread -
I don’t expect the Labour leader to embrace defunding the police. Corbyn never did – in fact one of Corbynism’s major incoherences was around what policing was for, whether a social democratic vision of policing was even possible. (I wrote on that here: https://www.lrb.co.uk/blog/2019/august/red-meat-for-the-faragists … )
Show this thread -
An easy but insufficient defence of the leadership is that the LOTO shouldn't be expected to embrace whatever left-wing Twitter (tiny, unrepresentative, loud, vain) thinks is good. So, sure, it’s unreasonable to expect the former DPP to tattoo ‘ACAB’ on his forehead or whatever.
Show this thread -
But it’s entirely reasonable to think that a political leader of the left ought to be able to answer a question like that while also insisting on bringing black experiences of racism - police & otherwise - in the UK *into* the conversation rather than airbrushing them out.
Show this thread -
(If anything, you could say his Starmer's record as DPP gives him exactly the kind of credibility to ignite that conversation in the UK in a way that Corbyn - with his history as an inveterate leftist backbencher - would never have been able to.)
Show this thread -
Does it make me angry? Sure, but there’s enough of that online. I also think it rather sad & a bit tawdry. Left-wing twitter sometimes interprets Starmer with wild bad faith, or elevates mild flubs into world historical catastrophes. But this I thought was actually shameful.
Show this thread -
Last thought: Starmer’s reaction to protest has been consistently dismissive. Perhaps another overcorrection; perhaps a difficult one for Labour leaders anyway, wanting to balance receptiveness to movements, wide appeal, ‘normalcy’ etc – especially now, post-Corbyn.
Show this thread -
But an explanation of the political difficulties isn't actually a defence (although it sometimes masquerades as one in centre-left journalism.) Finding how to balance all those competing problems is *the* political question. And it is hard.
Show this thread -
Does it matter? Well, you could put it this way: with an enormous recession underway, huge economic turbulence, an erratic right-wing government & more profound destabilisation coming in the next decade from climate change - do you think there will be less civil unrest, or more?
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.