@TeamYouTube Regarding copyright claims: Companies get 30 days to respond to appeals, but when it comes to a response from a YouTuber: "After 5 days any held revenue will be released to the claimant." Why not just make it 30 days for both parties?
-
Show this thread
-
Also - it would be great if claimants had to provide information about themselves. Some sort of contact information would be helpful so we could communicate outside of the copyright tools, and also to verify that they even have rights to the claims they're making.
4 replies 17 retweets 445 likesShow this thread -
With the way it works now, it's very easy for the system to be abused from the claimant's side, and incredibly intimidating from the YouTuber's. Especially when networks/YT just give us the runaround when seeking help. Speaking from personal experience. Just my 2 cents.
8 replies 13 retweets 426 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @brutalmoose
Thanks for reaching out. We found the 5-day period works for most uploaders whereas content owners may have hundreds of thousands of disputes to review, so we give them up to a month. Also, extending the 5-day period would make payments (disbursed monthly) more complicated.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
"Complicated"? So you’re lazy. PEOPLE ARE LOSING THEIR WELL EARNED MONEY BECAUSE YOU LET ANY CHUCKLEFUCK TAKE IT. Do something about it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.