Newsweek et al are claiming a 2016 clip shows Barrett arguing against replacing Scalia. In context, she was just explaining SCOTUS history said she didn't think either side of the debate "can claim that there's a rule governing one way or the other"https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/no-amy-coney-barrett-did-not-say-it-was-inappropriate-to-replace-antonin-scalia-during-2016-presidential-election …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The hypocrisy we see with Barrett is not different from that of most Evangelicals supporting Trump.https://www.vidrise.com/v/r3pxy/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lmao, why wouldn't you just post the clip in context? It's because she says exactly what you are saying she didn't. Additionally, she is full of shit about Kennedy's nomination elsewhere in this clip.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Even if she did, so what?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
That's pretty deceptively cut off. If you watch the entire answer (starting at about 3:30) it's pretty clear that's not what she's saying.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQcsR-hPkLg …
- Show replies
-
-
-
there’s a video or her saying it?
-
It's deceptively cut off. Watch the whole clip starting at about 3:30https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQcsR-hPkLg …
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.