PhilInBioMed

@philinbiomed

Institute of Philosophy *in* Biology and Medicine at Bordeaux. International network of like-minded centers.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: rujan 2016.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @philinbiomed

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @philinbiomed

  1. prije 7 sati

    Video of Jonathan Birch's () talk in Bordeaux PhilInBioMed Seminars: "The Search for Invertebrate Consciousness".

    Poništi
  2. prije 23 sata

    Thomas Pradeu's () Open Access book Philosophy of Immunology asks why has immunology become so central in our daily lives – and why that matters philosophically:

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    2. velj

    Latest papers in Biology & Philosophy: extended evolutionary synthesis, generalized Darwinism, and the end of science... :

    Poništi
  4. 31. sij

    Sign up for this unique summer school, where PhD students and postdocs from philosophy, biology and medicine will come together to seek new solutions to conceptual problems of scientific research. Learn to think out of the box and most of all: have fun!

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    "Decoupling of brain function from structure reveals regional behavioral specialization in humans" in by and - cool work addressing how strongly brain function is bound by the underlying structural wiring diagram

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    Always wonderful to glimpse Lorraine Daston's thoughts, and this interview on the history of the "self-evident", calculation, formalization and automation in science is a very good read

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    Our new website is live! C'mon and have a look around. We hope you like it.

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    Continuous exogenous: many components of the microbiome; discontinuous endogenous: cancer cells.

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    BSPS President from KCL to Cambridge's Russell Professorship - Daily Nous

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Lively today with bio-anthropologists Stanislava Eisová (visiting fellow) and Lumila Menéndez (postdoc fellow) on variation in craniovascular imprints!

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    30. sij

    (6/6) Sixth (and final!) claim of the book: "The system and the system intimately interact. Neuroimmunologists’ claims that the immune system can influence behavior and even cognition are worth examining." Open access:

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. sij

    OY! HPS Postdoc with the one and only Jutta Schickore open! Project: “Rigor: control, analysis and synthesis in historical and systematic perspectives”. (Join our department while we still plan world domination!) Apply/details (Feb 15) here:

    , , i još njih 7
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    No. Or at least it was not the original sense, which was clearly about endogenous vs. exogenous. Of course, you can always call "nonself" a discontinuity, but some exogenous elements are continuous and some endogenous elements are discontinuous. So the clarification is important.

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    29. sij

    (5/6) Fifth claim of the book: " results from a process of decohesion in a multicellular organism, and the immune system has a major influence on the control of this process."

    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    How to make undergraduate students aware of the role of values in science? Read our paper 'Science and values in undergraduate education', co-authored by Edwin Koster and me, and published in Science & Education today: (open access).

    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    (4/6) Fourth claim of the book: "The immune system plays a key role in delineating (and constantly redrawing) the boundaries of a biological individual, determining which elements can be part of that individual, and insuring its cohesion."

    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    What is a good explanation in evolutionary biology? Our new paper published in addresses this question. It identifies criteria for why and when explanations of are better than those of 'standard evolutionary theory.'

    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    Thank you, Ron! The idea was indeed to suggest a new way of seeing the traditional question of immunogenicity. Later, especially with , I have tried to make the discontinuity criterion more precise:

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    I was curious about what philosophers and scientists thought were the most important contributions of philosophy of science to working scientists and I stumbled upon this interesting oped in "Opinion: Why science needs philosophy" 1/n

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    If you haven't already, you should check out this great historical review by & on and , where they argue for the inclusion of in the current cancer classification scheme. |

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·