hmm.. if only people were building platforms to openly discuss problems and explicitly incentivize milestones 
people working on this: ( @alexeyguzey, @james_ough, @ethanjaldrich, @jackpetrison, @ProblemsSighted )https://twitter.com/james_ough/status/1093569856065146880 …
-
it might be hard to incentivize 'insight' yes, but creating funding mechanisms that allow researchers to go off-piste from the traditional benchmarks financially and time-wise might allow for an environment where insight can develop. (will read Candle problem)
In that case we probably do mean something different by "incentivize". I see a lot of good research papers get rejected just because they don't have a box where their number is higher than someone else's number. That creates certain incentives in the field.
-
-
Obviously the only solution is to reanimate the corpse of J. C. R. Licklider.
-
that was the first on our list of incentivized milestones...
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.