Conversation

Postgres Core team is at a potential pivot point in its history.. this might be a good time to expand core, maybe from 5 to 9? It would preserve the 50% rule, preserve the institutional history of the current team members, and add some diversity and new talent into the group..

Quote Tweet

PostgreSQL

@PostgreSQL

Oct 20, 2020

News: Statement from the PostgreSQL Core Team on the EDB acquisition of 2ndQuadrant postgresql.org/about/news/sta

Replying to

I agree this would be a good thing. Yet I believe Core deserves a much deeper rethinking. Like: - adhering to the same rules Core states for others (like members to be elected, not life-time members) - turn it into a legal person - prevent multiple positions for the same person

Replying to

and

Elected by whom, exactly? We can either make it completely inclusive (i.e. literally anybody can show up and vote), or we can exclude some number of people based on some quasi-arbitrary criteria. This creates a huge burden for people that aren't you.

Replying to

and

There are many options (e.g.: open elections, among contributors, among "members" --which is exactly what Core demands of any Postgres NPO--). The only wrong answer, in my opinion, is indefinite term, non elected. That has a name in politics that mostly nobody likes, for reason.

Replying to

and

It's very hard to take you seriously because you're not acknowledging any downside to what you propose, nor any upside to the status quo. The status quo certainly has its problems, but this isn't helping.

12:10 AM · Oct 21, 2020Twitter Web App

Replying to

and

There is definitely upside to proper elections of Leadership. FreeBSD is a perfect example and having leadership that accepts accountability and acts at the same level of their own demands is nothing but a good thing. Are there hurdles ? they are more than worth crossing