Peter Suber

@petersuber

Working for to research. If you follow me for news, then also follow (). I aim for comprehensive coverage there, not here.

Vrijeme pridruživanja: kolovoz 2009.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @petersuber

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @petersuber

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    16. tra 2019.
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  2. prije 7 sati

    Many thanks to for releasing v 2.2.0.4 of , the tagging platform and feed aggregator. Among hundreds of other tag-based projects, TagTeam runs the Tracking Project (, ).

    Poništi
  3. prije 9 sati

    4/ I urge UKRI to make the search even harder by adding one more box to tick -- significant experience and leadership on .

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. prije 9 sati

    3/ And the article doesn't even mention that Walport was a significant and experienced leader on , from his time as director of the .

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. prije 9 sati

    2/ "Credibility with three key constituencies – academia, industry and government – will be crucial....It is going to be very hard to find someone who ticks all these boxes."

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. prije 9 sati

    1/ Today's has a good piece on how hard it will be to replace Mark Walport () as the head of ().

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  7. prije 13 sati

    Last November the North Dakota State Library decided to boycott Macmillan until January 2020. Now it has decided to boycott Macmillan indefinitely.

    Poništi
  8. 2. velj

    When the says that is "probably carcinogenic" and Trump's gives says otherwise, who are you going to believe? Clue: The Center for Food Safety () reports that the EPA "relied almost entirely on studies."

    Poništi
  9. 2. velj

    From : "When the story of the coronavirus (2019-nCOV) is finally written, it might well become a template for the utopian dream of — where research data is shared freely, unrestrained by competition, paywalls and patents."

    Poništi
  10. 2. velj

    From : "I propose...the “Integrity Factor” for journals...the number of retractions in, say, a 5‐ or 10‐year period divided by the number of original research papers published." (Paywalled)

    Poništi
  11. 31. sij

    Kudos to the 71 organizations that just released this important statement on the rapid and open sharing of new coronavirus research.

    Poništi
  12. 31. sij

    2/ He's not running again and needn't please red voters. Hence, don't call his vote a cynical move to stay in power. It's a sign of catastrophically lowered standards, the biggest problem we'll face in trying to make American decent and democratic again.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 31. sij

    1/ believes that Trump did wrong *and* that there's ample evidence for it. Voted against more evidence because he thinks there's already enough. Believes these wrongs are not impeachable offenses.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 31. sij

    I like the new Sorbonne declaration on research data rights. (But why is it an image scan that doesn't support cutting/pasting? Didn't the 9 major university consortia behind it want to help us quote & discuss its principles? And why is it undated?)

    Poništi
  15. 30. sij

    In this 1987 article, I show how the same structural problem affects the power to amend the constitution. (Basically, South Dakotans have 45x the power of Californians.)

    Poništi
  16. 30. sij

    Reminder to the world's greatest deliberative body: Without a fair trial, acquittal ≠ exoneration.

    Poništi
  17. 30. sij
    Poništi
  18. 29. sij

    Retweeting this because spam calls to my office number are on the rise. Grr.

    Poništi
  19. 28. sij

    Nonviolent civil resistance campaigns are (generally) more effective than violent ones, in all parts of the world. See the fascinating (1945-2014) and interactive visualizations.

    Poništi
  20. 28. sij

    "Noting that while handles its high submissions and downloads for just a couple of million dollars, the spends $10 million on publications, and spends $193 million, [ said] 'something stinks.' "

    Poništi
  21. 27. sij
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·