Solution: impose economic costs on voting so that miners are incentivized to reflect user preferences. #ScalingBitcoin
-
-
Replying to @zooko
Proposal: to increase, defer part of block reward; To decrease: reclaim previously deferred reward.
#ScalingBitcoin1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @zooko
Allow users to increase or decrease sensitivity via bitcoin-days-destroyed weighted votes.
#ScalingBitcoin1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zooko
This scheme is derived from ideas by Greg Maxwell, Peter Todd, Meni Rosenfeld, and Jeff Garzik.
#ScalingBitcoin1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @zooko
The code is written: https://github.com/maaku/bitcoin/tree/flexcap …
#ScalingBitcoin2 replies 9 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @zooko
Future work: back-test it against corpuses of blocks and mempools.
#ScalingBitcoin1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zooko
Actually I'm still confused. How come miners aren't already incentivized to pick the blocksize which is optimal for users?
#ScalingBitcoin3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @peterktodd
@petertoddbtc Don't miners have the incentive to aggregate over the preferences of all users—i.e. to make the most money?#ScalingBitcoin1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
-
Replying to @peterktodd
@petertoddbtc What's the social good that is underproduced? Txn capacity? That doesn't seem correct to me. (Uncertainly.)0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.