All miners on the panel expressed support for increased block size, with various caveats. #ScalingBitcoin
-
-
Replying to @zooko
Next question: BIP101 or BIP100? 7 out of 8 miners say BIP100. 1 abstains.
#ScalingBitcoin1 reply 5 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @zooko
At least two miners expressed concern about bandwidth issues due to Great Firewall of China.
#ScalingBitcoin1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
-
Replying to @zooko
Multiple miners expressed willingness to follow another solution if it had consensus, and asked for simplicity and ease of deployment.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zooko
One miner (KnC; not Chinese) says he just wants more people to use Bitcoin, which means bigger blocks. Scattered applause.
#ScalingBitcoin2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @zooko
Q: if we implement IBLT, how would this change your choices about blocksize? A1: I care more about CPU and disk.
#ScalingBitcoin1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @zooko
Q2: What about circumventing Great Firewall of China, or asking gov to uncensor Bitcoin? A2: Un-GFW'ed lines are available.
#ScalingBitcoin1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zooko
Q3: CPU cost is GetBlockTemplate or something else? A3: 1 MiB block, submitted to bitcoind, takes up to 1 sec (no SSD).
#ScalingBitcoin1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @zooko
One miner says the core developers understand the system—let them come up with a solution, and the miners will support it.
#ScalingBitcoin2 replies 3 retweets 4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.