Weird that that didn't make it into the stories dunking on Tom Cotton
Show this thread
NEW: Richard Ebright, molecular biologist quoted by @washingtonpost to rebut theory that the virus was a bioweapon, tells @AndrewKerrNC COVID-19 may have leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virologyhttps://dailycaller.com/2020/04/02/coronavirus-leaked-wuhan-institute-virology-richard-ebright-shi-zhengli/ …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What is the likelihood that this science was done (probably valid) and that essentially the conovirus happened in the same city where it was being engineered.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So it was a bioweapon accidentally unleashed.....got it.
-
Next week is when we find out that word "accidentally" is removed.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Plot twist: a bat flew into the evil bioweapon lab, flew out, and then someone ate it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yet the MSM has been working round the clock to shut that story down. “It came from bats” came out about 30 seconds after we all first heard about it. And now I read that the bat they blamed it on isn’t even sold at the wet market
- Show replies
-
-
-
A person with good analytical skills will see the fallacies in this article. Or, you could just believe it because you want there to be some conspiracy because your life is boring?
-
There doesnt need to be a conspiracy. Lab that researches coronaviruses uses live animals to test communicability between animals. Some idiot sells infected lab animal to wet market. Someone gets sick after buying infected animal. This is plausible and fits the evidence
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.