How is this not the worst of all worlds.https://next.redhat.com/2018/11/14/ukl-a-unikernel-based-on-linux/ …
-
-
-
Replying to @kubernetesonarm
Many of the advantages of unikernels are simplicity, efficiency, and safety. Starting with a code base that is none of these, and then attempting to achieve it while maintaining compatibility seems infeasible. I think they fail to understand why unikernel adoption struggles.
4 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @ibuildthecloud @kubernetesonarm
I challenge their core assertion, "The fundamental problem is that today’s unikernels ... have abandoned the evolutionary community process that has made Linux such a success." Show me your data.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Based on my experience in OSS over the last 4 years, I'd guess OSS unikernel projects probably struggle for the same reasons that other OSS projects do. Lack of marketing budget or giant corporate interest.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
"evolutionary community process..." WTF are they talking about? Did they just suggest unikernels are not OSS? MirageOS is a Linux
@linuxfoundation project.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @allingeek @ibuildthecloud and
Not speaking for RH or authors but this was hopefully more about leveraging existing Linux ecosystem investments & bringing associated community thereof along an alternate, perceived-easier path of “doing unikernels”.. unfortunate choice of words tho so I might contact them tmrw
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
If you talk to Ali send my regards. It would be really cool to talk to them. We'd be happy sharing our experiences with RH.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.