who should participate in the block chain? I want to avoid creating a single authority on identity.
-
-
Replying to @peidran
good question. Gossip might also work. Basically there needs to be a semi-public way to detect when attacker tries to publish a key
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
so a credible way to say "Peter has been using this key for years" is valuable.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @loganb
I think the solution for public entities like brands is fundamentally different from social interaction
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and this delineation is orthogonal to the medium of communication
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peidran
I don't think I follow that assertion. I'm solvin for the case: "I want to send a message to Peter. I look up a public
for him…"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
"…I need some credible way to know, 'this key comes from a chain of custody for Peter for years"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @loganb
there's an answer that depends on some public authority–a blockchain or something more traditional–
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and an answer rooted in our continued interactions over those years
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peidran
I suspect the "continued interactions" path covers less communication that it may seem at first glance.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
totally, it's just particularly relevant to my interests
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.