Sex is great, but have you tried refactoring from Arc<Mutex<T>> to channel<T> ?
-
-
Replying to @o0ignition0o
You might like pinky-swear :D Once I realised that, I put a little sugar on top of it, and implemented std::future::Future on that sugar.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Keruspe
Nice name ! It seems to be a pretty cool crate indeed
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o0ignition0o @Keruspe
The release history does not inspire confidence.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Keruspe @o0ignition0o
By the numbers you've had twelve breaking changes since March 30?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Might be looking at the wrong crate, but I see it at 4.0, if it was following semver, that would be 3 breaking changes (backwards incompatible) since the 1.0 release that happened... on Valentine’s Day !


1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @o0ignition0o @Keruspe
ah, it's <1 versions that break on minor version changes.
12:19 AM - 27 Apr 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.