Siri show me an example of Female Reputational Mutilation.........https://twitter.com/NimkoAli/status/1204356208112668672 …
-
-
Replying to @nathansldennis
Wow, I watched the video with Owen Jones. I have to admit that I did not know who Nimco Ali was. But the fact that she cannot admit that the statement was homophobic is amazing. She could have said its wrong but that the clown has realised the error of his ways or something.
2 replies 0 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @DarrenGuy @nathansldennis
I wonder how she spins her way out of "watermelon smiles" and loads of other shit he wrote, or allowed to be published in the spectator?
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @DarrenGuy
It's really sad, she is someone who has done incredible work on FGM but has just had her Gerald Ratner moment. Brexit supporter as well so the racism / homophobia is not unexpected
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Being anti FGM doesn’t give you a pass to be a shitty human.
2 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @kyunginssi @MakeMoreNoise2 and
Generally speaking anti FGM activists are shitty humans as they discriminate the victims of genital mutilation according to their sex, and thus ignore or even belittle the vast majority of victms. Some even have their own sons mutilated!
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @SimonPopeDK @MakeMoreNoise2 and
FGM is worse so you can miss me with that. Some religions also make it a requirement for boys to be circumcised so it’s better to make it safe instead of banning it. Once again, Nimko / Nimco whatever her name is is not a representative for anyone but herself
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kyunginssi @MakeMoreNoise2 and
Both are genital mutilation, on what basis is it worse for girls than boys? Just as some make it a requirement for girls so the same goes if you truly believe in breaching human rights for the sake of religion. Have you the same consideration for religious amputation of limbs?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @SimonPopeDK @kyunginssi and
Both bad but FGM worse because a circumcision takes a pointless bit of skin, FGM takes the whole clitoris and is designed to reduce or eliminate female sexual pleasure. Nimco Ali's still an idiot.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
MGM has always been about damaging male pleasure. Most FGM is the removal of the clitoralhood and possibly the inner labia. These tissues are analogous to the foreskin. Foreskins is not pointless skin. It is the most sensitive part of the penis, and provides protection.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.