I just stumbled across a circumcision debate. I thought anti vaccine debates were intense. Woah, nelly.pic.twitter.com/sSBFrvEXXA
-
-
Replying to @MGigger
Nicole Retweeted
Yeah well its genital mutilation https://twitter.com/_tastefulinsult/status/1134345220563361792?s=21 …
Nicole added,
This Tweet is unavailable.3 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
-
Replying to @aar0nsadler @MGigger
Well not really an opinion. Its what happens. And foreskin os the most sensitive part of rhe penis. Thats a factpic.twitter.com/D1gvICsROG
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peaceniky @MGigger
Is your computer and phone just crammed full of photos of penises and foreskins?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aar0nsadler @peaceniky
I think the FBI would be alarmed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MGigger @aar0nsadler
Hardly. That image is froma peer reviewed article
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peaceniky @aar0nsadler
As if that was the only picture shared today.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Also can’t help but notice you all don’t share the more recent studies that show there’s no statistical difference in sensitivity between circumcision and non circumcision. But you guys go.https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/04/160414114249.htm …
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
If you look closely at that study they only tested THE OUTER foreskin. Probably intentionally. They did not test any of the normally internal parts of the foreskin, none of the mucosal membranes. Of course they disn’t find any difference
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.