The circumcision of baby boys without significant medical reason or necessity is unethical:
-
Show this thread
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @HuieCaleb @Vivianglick
For the record, anesthesia is routinely used these days. As a physician , I admit I am certainly not “pro -circumcision”. Is it mutilation? I guess poor outcomes would be deemed that way.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The glans and inner foreskin are sexuslly importsnt tissues that are supposed to remain internal until intercourse. Circ makes those external and removes most of the innerforeskin, frenulum and ridged band. It is certsinly genital mutilation. The usa is culturally blind
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Is your whole account dedicated to searching out people who are talking about circumcision and genital mutilation and arguing with them?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Yes. We need to stand up for childrens rights. Cutting girls is wrong, and so is cutting boys. Its a basic violation of human dignity to strap a child down and remove a part of his/her body without PRESSING medical need.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.