Why?
-
-
Replying to @Newgirlbianca_ @WTMN80
I'm pretty sure it means to cut around something laterally, but generally on its own and unqualified I think most people would assume removal of the foreskin from the winky.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Bingo!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Newgirlbianca_ @WTMN80
Sorry, I meant "removal of the foreskin from the Male winky" One must endeavour to be accurate in one's medical terminology.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Is this cause of all the whingy intactivists?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Newgirlbianca_ @WTMN80
Intactivists. Good word, for a portmanteau.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
It’s what they call themselves. They are truly the worst people on twitter.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Newgirlbianca_ @WTMN80
I can see why there'd be an argument against child ritual circumcision, but if people want to do it for their own health and hygiene reasons as grownups what's the problem? I've not come across the intactivist community yet so don't know the full extent of their beef.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
EXACTLY THIS. Oh my god you’re so lucky, they’re worse than vegans and cyclists.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Newgirlbianca_ @WTMN80
I just think it's probably not healthy for the rest of one's manbrain to spend all that time and energy thinking about one's Male winky. Are they intactivists because they think if they stretch it they get an extra half inch on the length which almost brings it up to average?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Intactivists are people (primarily in the USA) who fight against CHILD circumcision. Its done in the USA routinely to boys. Around 80% in the 1980-90’s and thankfully is falling because of...INTACTIVISTS. Many of the male intactivists were strapped down as babies and mutilated
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.