NOT GENITALIA? What is it then? have you ever even seen a foreskin. It is absolutely genitalia, and its removal is a mutilation of normal healthy genital form and function. American Circumcision on #netflix is a great place to learn something. You should try
-
-
Look at it this way, my simple friends. Genital amputation = removal of the genitals, yes? So someone who had their genitals amputated would be unable to reproduce, as genitals = reproductive organs. How do you explain the circumcised men in the world who have fathered children?
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Circumcision is amputatation of the most sexually sensitive parts of the penis
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This is false.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Oh I see, your concern is pleasure and not function. See this is why I (and every medical organization) does not classify circumcision as amputation of the genitals: because it isn’t. Get (another) hobby. You’re just wrong.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
And that pleasure is important for human beings. Otherwise nature wouldn’t have designed (through natural selection of course) human foreskin with so many nerve endings. Really. You should read more about the frenulum and ridged band
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Please start educating me about my penis immediately after I am so presumptuous as to try to educate you about your vagina.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You may educate me if you have direct experience and/or bring to my attention information about a part of my vagina i don’t have. I assume i have more experience with foreskin than you
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And you know what happens when you assume.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But i’m correct aren’t I?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.