Was Jesus Christ circumcised (a.k.a., genitals amputated)? The options in this poll are: 1. No, he was not. 2. Partly, so he gets the best of both worlds 3. Yes, he was 4. I don't know / Other explanation (reply is optional) (Please re-share this so that more people can vote.)
-
Show this thread
-
-
-
Replying to @randolf828
I get what you're striving for, but speculation about Jesus's junk isn't a very good way to illustrate that. It opens more of a door to your mental state than advocating against circumcision. If you really want to be known as the guy who thinks about Jesu Penis, okay.
5 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Pevenly1 @randolf828
I mean, circumcision is not genital amputation, so I don’t think this guy knows what the fuck he’s talking about.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
cutting off the most sensitive part of the body certainly is amputation. its the removal of the center of male sexual pleasure. Its a barbaric mutilation ritual.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Regardless of your opinions on circumcision, words mean things, and the phrase “genital amputation” means the genitals have been completely amputated. That is not the case with circumcision. Deliberately and inaccurately using such extreme words is disengenuous and insidious.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Roll your eyes, but its there. Your simply culturally blind
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.