Was Jesus Christ circumcised (a.k.a., genitals amputated)? The options in this poll are: 1. No, he was not. 2. Partly, so he gets the best of both worlds 3. Yes, he was 4. I don't know / Other explanation (reply is optional) (Please re-share this so that more people can vote.)
-
Show this thread
-
-
Replying to @TheAlienResists
Randolf Richardson 張文道 Retweeted Randolf Richardson 張文道
Randolf Richardson 張文道 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @randolf828 @TheAlienResists
Do you know what amputation means?
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @geoffreyianbara @TheAlienResists
Yes, I do. It's a word with a variety of very similar meanings, most of which involve the removal of some part of body. Circumcision, when performed on little boys, is the amputation of their foreskin (it's also child sex abuse, but that's beyond the scope of your question).
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @randolf828 @TheAlienResists
But you said amputation of the genitals. The foreskin is not in itself genitalia. Using imprecise terminology to advance your argument on emotional terms is dishonest.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @geoffreyianbara @TheAlienResists
Randolf Richardson 張文道 Retweeted Randolf Richardson 張文道
Randolf Richardson 張文道 added,
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @randolf828 @TheAlienResists
I reiterate that foreskin is not in itself genitalia, and so to refer to circumcision as genital amputation is incorrect. Further, I submit that you use incorrect terminology intentionally for the drama, in an attempt to inspire a more emotional reaction to your statement.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.