Was Jesus Christ circumcised (a.k.a., genitals amputated)? The options in this poll are: 1. No, he was not. 2. Partly, so he gets the best of both worlds 3. Yes, he was 4. I don't know / Other explanation (reply is optional) (Please re-share this so that more people can vote.)
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @randolf828
Circumcision DOES NOT mean amputating genitals, you dimwit. It removes the foreskin that covers the penis, thereby making the peeny less stinky and more resistant to germs and a host of nasty skin diseases. Jeez. Look up your stuff.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @polyvinylfilm
Randolf Richardson 張文道 Retweeted Randolf Richardson 張文道
Randolf Richardson 張文道 added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @randolf828
Why would you even say « genital amputation » to begin with? My god, NOTHING IS AMPUTATED WHEN A MAN IS CIRCUMCISED. Don’t tell people this crap! Go Google “circumcision” and learn before you speak. Even take a look at the pictures (EGADS!!!).
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
you need more research. Circumcison removes the MOST sensitive part of the penis. The foreskin is the center of a man's sexual experience. circumcision is mutilation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.