-
-
Replying to @cooney21 @peaceniky and
All FGM is a problem. Male circumcision is not.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @peaceniky and
You have absolutely no moral basis for distinguishing between the two.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @peaceniky and
Yes I do. FGM is torture designed to remove sexual appetite from girls for life. It is wholly centered on scarring the woman and creating the least hospital environment for her pleasure.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @peaceniky and
Male
#circumcision is also torture, necessarily reduces sexual pleasure for the male involved and quite literally scars his penis for life.#i21 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @peaceniky and
The “scar” doesn’t inhibit sexual pleasure. Why do you turn your face in the eyes of evidence? Cut men have just as good of sex as uncut. You can’t deny that.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @peaceniky and
It's a scar. No quotes. It's the lack of an innervated foreskin that necessarily limits sexual pleasure. You can't deny that, although it's clear you wish you could b/c you cut your sons
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cooney21 @peaceniky and
How can you claim sexual pleasure is limited when cut men have equal sex as uncut?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tesslatweets @cooney21 and
They cannot have equal pleasure if most of their sensitivity is removed
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @peaceniky @cooney21 and
Yet somehow, they do. Add is very much psychological as well as physiological. Regardless the reason, the result is similar sexual patterns.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Slmost every man i have hesrd that got cut as an adult without medical reason has said there is a huge loss of sensitivity
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.