Key word...PERSONALLY and EVERYONE should get the chance to make their own personsl decisions
-
-
Replying to @peaceniky @Mephitus_Skunk and
No one gets to choose everything that happens to them.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SwangoKevin @peaceniky and
Careful with that argument, it goes into some VERY dark places to excuse some pretty horrific things....
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Mephitus_Skunk @peaceniky and
Maybe but this one thing is likely acceptable given that many things do happen without consent.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SwangoKevin @peaceniky and
If an action on a child cannot be shown to be beneficial, and can even be shown to have objectively negative outcomes, why support it? Why not allow pedophilia using that same reasoning?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Mephitus_Skunk @peaceniky and
All along I’ve said why. Religion and some hygiene considerations.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SwangoKevin @peaceniky and
So if was a religious practice to bath a 10 year old girl before and after you bed her, would that be an acceptable comparison? It's a religious practice that encourages hygiene after all.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Mephitus_Skunk @peaceniky and
“If”? And, who doesn’t bathe before and after. Ew...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SwangoKevin @peaceniky and
tl;dr religious historical practice is no reason to permanently mutilate anyone by any means. Such an argument still supports FGM.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Mephitus_Skunk @peaceniky and
No. The reasons matter. Controlling a [woman] through circumcision is way different than establishing a covenant and improving hygiene.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Well this is just a kind of religous bigotry then. Your form of mutilation is hygenic and a covenant, their form is control. But if you ask them theirs is a hygenic covenant too
-
-
Replying to @peaceniky @Mephitus_Skunk and
That’s not what I’ve read and I seriously doubt it. It’s about controlling women and now it seems you just want to control how families choose to tear their children - given it’s generally non harmful and more hygienic. If it’s healthier for girls, I’m all for it.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.