I know I’m not a guy but I think unless it’s medically necessary, it shouldn’t be done
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @PetiteNicoco @CynChamplin
This is a problem that women seem to have that men just don’t. We don’t care about this issue, but what I do mind is women telling men that they’re better off w/out circumcision when they have never had a penis before. Circumcision has no ill effects on us, so leave us alone.
12 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Speak for yourself, i could name hundreds of men who are and hate it, and probably hundreds more who care about the issue. As a gay man who's been with a good number of both circumcision DEFINITELY has ill effects.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
I’m going to call BS on this. The VAST majority of men don’t care about this issue, unless they’ve been duped by women who want to lorde over men & tell them waht they should care about. Btw, “ill effects” has nothing to do w/receiving the penis, it has to do w/owning the penis.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Actually some of the ill effects have to do with receiving it, but those weren't the ones I am talking about, difference in sensitivity is quite clear between the two. And I'd say the vast majority of men don't care about this issue BECAUSE they've been duped.
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
How can circumcised men be “duped” when there hasn’t been a movement to try & convince us that we would feel less w/out a circumcision? The only folks who have tried to convince us of anything about the pluses or minuses of circumcision have been the radical anti-circ feminists.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
By 2 centuries of pseudoscience started by puritanical morality that caused it to be normalised perhaps? By the belief that it's better, or even more often preferred by women so they force it onto their sons?
10 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ReyosB @Stephen_Agnew and
And it's amazing you claim that, when radical femininsts are a big part of what's standing in the way, those who don't care about anything affecting men, those like Nimco that say nothing but "We have it worse, focus on us"
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
False. Radical feminists are the ones pushing to end circumcision, because it gives them power over men—to dictate an idea over men. Circumcision doesn't affect us men, we are 100% fine without it. No circumcised man has reported not having an abundance of pleasure during sex.
11 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Anti-mgm campaigners are called MRAs on one side and radical feminists on another. The truth is its just normal people from all walks of life who understand the damage caused by mgm and advocate for it to stop by educating people, like yourself, about what a normal penis is
-
-
Replying to @peaceniky @Stephen_Agnew and
This is true, by Stephen we're called radical feminists, by radical feminists I have been dismissed as an MRA. The feminists are more correct, though not in dismissing all MRAs, since there's probably as many misogynistic MRAs as there are misandrist feminists, percent wise.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.