2> other forms of MGM, like say penile subincision, where the penis is split along the lenght of the urethra. Acting like all FGM is FGM III and hospital circumcision is the only MGM is dishonest, or uninformed.
-
-
Replying to @ReyosB @Northernbutnice and
At some point it was dishonest, and I am hoping that's just 40 years ago when this whole issue started, I am hoping it's just people like you being uninformed, and culturally biased. But I am pretty sure someone still knows the truth of both and is still pushing the narrative.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ReyosB @Northernbutnice and
It's also curious that you replied to the cultural tweet with a biological argument, I hadn't gotten into biology but if I did I would point out the clitoral hood is homologous to the foreskin and FGM 1A removes just that, other forms remove a portion or cut without removal.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Because I disagree with what your view to such an extent that it’s completely pointless Yes, the clitoral hood is, but as you well know that’s not all that FGM involves for many girls. Remind me which version of male circumcision involves the intentional removal of the glans?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Northernbutnice @ReyosB and
FGM = the intentional removal of the most sensitive part of female genitalia against the will of the individual. MGM = the intentional removal of the most sensitive part of male genitalia against the will of the individual. absolutely. 100%. comparable.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @peaceniky @ReyosB and
Only if you’re wilfully dishonest about what is removed for many girls subjected to FGM. Again, show me which version of male circumcision involves the removal of the glans? Does male circ lead to death in childbirth for those subjected to it?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Northernbutnice @peaceniky and
How about this, we agree to drop the comparisons if you agree to only fight against those forms of FGM that do involve what you're claiming, only FGM IIB, IIC and III have that childbirth risk, only those and IB have the partial clitordectomy.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ReyosB @Northernbutnice and
Either you have to abandon the fight to protect those girls who are subjected to less invasive procedures than boys are at a much, much higher rate, or admit that on the average FGM is less invasive than circumcision. The only option three is to continue to be dishonest.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ReyosB @Northernbutnice and
Plus of course you are pushing the false myth that the glans is the most sensitive part of the penis, it's not, it's been shown to be the least sensitive part time and time again, in pretty much every study of comparative sensitivity
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ReyosB @peaceniky and
So now you’re advocating denial of biological fact in order to equate the two? The glans of the penis is the male equivalent to the female clitoris. The foreskin is the male equivalent to the female labia minora. This is biological fact.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
But study after study has shown that the ridged band and frenulum are The most sensitive part of the penis. In fact the least sensitive parts of the foreskin are MORE sensitive than the most sensitive part of a circumcised penis. This is genital mutilationpic.twitter.com/wu8Z7gPp6a
-
-
Replying to @peaceniky @ReyosB and
Never said it wasn’t, what I said, repeatedly, was FGM and male circumcision are not the same, biologically or culturally.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Northernbutnice @ReyosB and
But they are. They both originated to damage sexuality, they both persist under false health claims and cultural normalization
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.