As a doctor, but I've examined both versions. The circumcised one is cleaner, easier to examine and a lot more attractive. I have no idea why anyone considers circumcision performed in boy neonates as genital mutilation. Female circumcision is another story.
are you joking? how long did you study to be a doctor? and you still don't know what a normal natural penis is looks like? how its supposed to function. Its genital mutilation because it removes the most sensitive part of the penis and exposes the rest to constant abrasion