Yes, it is. You claimed that your sons didn't need their foreskins anymore simply because you had them ablated. That's a fallacy. Simply amputating something does not change the anatomical fact that it is functional, innervated tissue necessary for full operation.
-
-
Sigh. I said they didn’t need them *anymore*. A severed, unreattachable body part that can no longer fulfill whatever function it MIGHT have once had is no longer necessary even if it might have once been. You cut off my leg I’ll say the same.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danieltkelley @KhazWolf and
> I said they didn’t need them *anymore* Still wrong. It's anatomical fact that they are necessary for a fully functioning penis. Just because you had them severed doesn't change anatomical fact. They still needed them, you just made it impossible for them to realize that.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
The point — and it is *exceedingly* clear — that if they kept the foreskins, they couldn’t do anything with them. Ergo, no need. You can’t possibly be this stupid.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danieltkelley @KhazWolf and
Being able to do something with them has nothing to do with their necessity. They're still necessary, and this point is exceedingly clear to anyone who has taken Logic 101 at a local community college. Seeing as how big words scare you, though, I suppose that's asking too much.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Big words don’t scare me (another point I’ve made very clear) — big words used because “I know a big word!” annoy me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danieltkelley @KhazWolf and
I can certainly dumb things down to a lower reading level if it'll help you stay on topic. Here: "Cutting babies? Bad!" Better?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
It solves one problem of yours, yes. You have others.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danieltkelley @KhazWolf and
Let's focus on your problems first. You're narcissistic and selfish, ignorant of male anatomy, paid someone to needlessly mutilate your sons, have no contrition, misuse basic words, trivialize the suffering of others (a sociopathic trait), and you digress as a stall tactic.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Hm. One at a time: No No No No Yep! No No No Man, you’re hovering around the Mendoza Line. That’s rough.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Give it up opticon. This guy ruined his son’s sexuality. Chances are they will be a minority in the future and most likely laughed st for their parents stupidity. Sad they had no choice though
-
-
Replying to @peaceniky @opticon9 and
Well, I’m circumcised, and my sexuality is fine. And no one has ever laughed at my circumcision. So shucks.
7 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Replying to @peaceniky @danieltkelley and
Undoubtedly. Kids these days are growing up in the information age and increased globalization. They'll absolutely learn that their parents unnecessarily mutilated their genitals, robbed them of sexual pleasure and function, all for disgusting, domineering reasons like aesthetics
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.