Lower penile cancer rates, lower std transmission, no foreskin issues of infection or to small to allow erections, no surgery later that is more extensive and painful later. Plus my father in law had to have it done at 68 and begged me to get him done.
-
-
Condoms are more effective for decreasing STD transmission, proper training of parents in cleaning the foreskin decreases issues of infection, and penile cancer rates are extremely low as-is, even for uncircumcised men. They’ve also said studies showing link ...
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @schulziee @Chinook87 and
...between penile cancer and uncircumcised do not take into consideration confounding factors. The argument for circumcision is not a strong one and genital mutilation should not be practiced. People freak about female mutilation but not male only because it’s been normalized
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
I know its hard to believe that its not a conspiracy to deform babies. Its a medical intervention that takes one min, is no big deal and will prevent a whole lotta suffering later. I had so many kids that were getting it done later. I will look up the stats.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Chinook87 @schulziee and
A medical intervention that no other secular medical organization recommends, has been called ethically irresponsible by Denmark, banned in Australian public hospitals But because a country with the most expensive and worst health care in developed world says it good you believe?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peaceniky @schulziee and
enjoy your penile cancer, increased std risk, uti problems, etc.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Chinook87 @schulziee and
Really You should get out of north america I live in one of the majority of countries that doesn’t practice this. NOT A PROBLEM. We have lower rates of STDs than USA, treat male UTI the same as for females. And penile cancer rates are so extremely low that it a ridiculous reason
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @peaceniky @schulziee and1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @Chinook87 @peaceniky and
This article is written not by a scientist but by CBS (which is not a medical institution) and quotes one Dr. from Australia but contains no citations. This is not a legitimate scientific study. Show me a legitimate source, then we can talk.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @schulziee @peaceniky and
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5478224/ … How about the CDC.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
would you really believe info from a country with the worst health care in the developed world?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.