Thanks for links I won’t click!
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
My sons didn’t need it anymore.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This is false. They need their entire penis to have a fully functional penis. You impaired them, without their consent. And you are not contrite about it.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Your first three sentences are varying degrees of wrong. Your fourth sentence is accurate, though.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Incorrect. All of my sentences were facts. Want to object? Try to prove them wrong and I'll gladly eviscerate your uninformed rebuttals. You won't, though, because you can't.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Once the foreskins were removed, they did not need them anymore. Even if I was wrong to have done it (I wasn’t, but not the point), at that point they were scrap skin. So your first sentence is already false. Wheeeeeeee
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
That is incorrect. The foreskin, ridged band, and frenulum are functional parts of the penis. Ablating them permanently impairs the penis which absolutely needs them to be fully functional. Chopping them off doesn't change anatomical fact; it merely changes anatomy.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
But they were removed. As I said, once they were gone, they were just scrap skin. Unless your contention is that they could be reattached and used again, they were removed, ergo my sons didn’t need them anymore.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Watch #americancircumcision on #netflix and see what circumcision really is. I dare you.https://circumcisionmovie.com
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.