That’s not the same and you know it. I’ll give you an example that it a little closer though. I cut the tip of my finger off when I was 4 years old. They sewed it back on and today I can’t feel any difference.
-
-
Replying to @bdenning79 @peaceniky and
However, a few years ago I had to have stitches to sew the skin back together on another finger and I still don’t have full feeling back on the scar. As adults we don’t heal the same way young children do.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bdenning79 @bobbob1016 and
Also, by your logic, we should be able to circumcise girls because their brains will adapt? I don’t think anyone would argue that cutting a girls genitals doesn’t damage female sexuality. Yet you do backflips to argue that cutting boys doesn’t damage male sexuality.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peaceniky @bdenning79 and
Sounds alot like simple cultural blindness
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peaceniky @bobbob1016 and
You actually could make an argument that cutting the clitoral hood wouldn’t affect very much. I’m not making that argument. I’m saying that for thousands of years men have dealt with this and been just fine. I had it done and I love it this way. That’s all I’m saying.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bdenning79 @peaceniky and
The argument isn't the same for female, female didn't have any benefit minus subservient women. They didn't have the issue of some women being unable to pee, nor dirt getting stuck in there, as dirt would still have a few places to be stuck either way.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bobbob1016 @bdenning79 and
Do you really think that the foreskin, which evolved on all mammals, including pre-humans exposed to all this without the aid of modern hygiene, was a mistake? Don’t you think natural selection would have gotten rid of it long ago if it was such a problem?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peaceniky @bdenning79 and
It can't be that precise. Nature isn't perfect. Doesn't some vein wrap around the esophagus or something then back to the heart? That's proof that natural selection is crude but it works. More of a "we'll fix it in post"
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bobbob1016 @bdenning79 and
Do we undergo routine surgery to correct this? Of course not, because its not a problem for the majority of people. Why do we « correct » having foreskin? For the vast majority of men its not a problem
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @peaceniky @bobbob1016 and
That’s true. It’s not medically necessary. I would like to point out that there is a big difference between FGM and circumcision sexually. Women generally have a much harder time orgasming, while many men have the reverse problem of premature ejaculation.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Nicole Retweeted
Nicole added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.