Known as khafz, it is less invasive than the male version: a small nick on the female foreskin. Yet it is outlawed in several countries, basis the WHO’s policy which treats nearly every non-Western ritual involving the genitals of females as mutilation.https://focuswashington.com/2019/01/10/undermines-religious-freedom-gender-equality/ …
I agree a nick is terrible, but if you think a nick is terrible you should also think the complete removal of the most sensitive part of genitalia is terrible, in males thats the foreskin
-
-
Male circumcision has not created problems but female cutting has as there is no scientific way to do it that is why fgc is being spoken against and survivors experience are horrible.
-
So under sterile conditions like those in which mgm is carried out, fgm is permissible?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.