also if you have some kind of issue that prevents you from viewing men as worthy of your fight against human rights violations, thats one thing. But these are not men, these are tiny babies a few days old.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
if you are trying to protect women and girls by separating the socially unacceptable harm done from them, from the socially acceptable harm done to males. Then you are simply wrong and sexist.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
yes if you argue that cutting the genitals of one sex causes harm but cutting the genitals of another does not cause harm. thats sexist. the rights of one gender are more important than the other. sexist. the pain of one more than the other. sexist.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
yes you do...but to say that the mutilation of one sex is not comparable to the mutilation of another sex is sexist.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Your right. There are way more men circumcised than women and the damage done by the most common form of male circumcisionis worse than the most common form of female circumcision
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Its not a void. Other people read your position and mine.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.