"In this article, we offer a critical examination of the tendency to segregate discussion of surgical alterations to the male and female genitals into separate compartments—the first known as circumcision, the second as genital mutilation." https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1525/maq.2007.21.3.301 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
also if you have some kind of issue that prevents you from viewing men as worthy of your fight against human rights violations, thats one thing. But these are not men, these are tiny babies a few days old.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
if you are trying to protect women and girls by separating the socially unacceptable harm done from them, from the socially acceptable harm done to males. Then you are simply wrong and sexist.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
yes if you argue that cutting the genitals of one sex causes harm but cutting the genitals of another does not cause harm. thats sexist. the rights of one gender are more important than the other. sexist. the pain of one more than the other. sexist.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
yes you do...but to say that the mutilation of one sex is not comparable to the mutilation of another sex is sexist.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.