You'd do it to 200 babies for the sake of 1 man? It's much more accurate later in life when the thing is full-sized. The tiniest mistake on a baby is magnified later. And a man can manage his own pain relief and safety. It's less risky.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @oldbeachmamaa
A big Danish cohort study found only 1 male in 200 needs to be cut by the age of 18. What's weird is this crazy determination to cut healthy babies.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @oldbeachmamaa @intactive
so then you are against forced genital mutilation of children, otherwise you are forcing what you believe is right on some one else. quite literally tieing them to a board and forcing them.
3:13 AM - 24 Jan 2019
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.