Circumcision is not comparable to FGM.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @CheesusSliced @mawnx
FGM causes life long medical conditions and is done in very different circumstances than male circumcision. To compare FGM to male circumcision it would be taking part of the shaft of the penis not just the foreskin and to a child not infant.
6 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
The foreskin is a part of the shaft. It has functions. MGM can also cause life long problems. In Africa, boys are often cut as teens instead of infants. Boys die from it. It is horrific.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Ok I am sorry that wasn't clear I mean't cutting the shaft down past the head so about 1/2 off.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
On some men it is.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
There are men regularly getting half of their penis cut off as small children. I hadn't heard of that. I will go look it up.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The amount of skin removed varies. You can about how much skin was removed proportionately on an adult by the scarring.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Been looking and cannot find anywhere where male circumcision includes cutting off half of the whole penis not just skin.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
its the most sensitive skin on a man's body.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.