Its harmful for women but fine for men. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4277517/ …
-
-
Replying to @danlivni @peaceniky and
. Super statement "benefits exceed risks by 100 to 1 ...half of uncircumcised boys will experience a medical condition caused by their foreskin If Darby’s arguments were applied ...to beneficial low-risk medical procedures, childhood vaccinations would also need to be avoided
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @realChaim_Rubin @danlivni and
Last year, Brian Morris claimed to the media the benefit:risk ratio was 200:1. When asked online, he lied that it was always 100:1. So yeah, not a reliable figure or source.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KyleChenIntact @danlivni and
. Probably the outcome of newer findings The distinction beteeen the two figures is trivial What counts is the order of magnitude
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @realChaim_Rubin @danlivni and
Sorry but no. He denied to intactivists online that he had ever said “200:1”, which is disproven by media. He also denied being a member of Gilgal Society, which his own website archives disprove. He is a proven liar.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KyleChenIntact @danlivni and
. This from the guy who told me i dont know Judaism quoting a lunatic I.E. you don't have to engage any facts data research findings testimonials or surveys because he said this, or I said that Maybe Insults, accusations, allegations Your material is all anecdotal &subjective
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @realChaim_Rubin @danlivni and
Incorrect. I’ve cited multiple reputable sources. All you do is keep circling back to the same pedophile’s papers, whose work is shunned by the AAP.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KyleChenIntact @danlivni and
. He's not a pedophile, but in the worst case he didn't write those papers, just collect &curate them The only people with a serious interest in prepuces are pedophiles Check yourself You would like to use an ad hominem to bury the truth
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @realChaim_Rubin @danlivni and
Again, you’re free to browse his site’s archives. The pedophilic photo is real. If people didn’t mutilate infants, I wouldn’t pay any attention to children. I find it strange that anyone would feel the urge to cut a child’s genitals. Most of the world does just fine without it.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
I’m not going to try too hard. You’re touting your USMC canon fodder stupidity with what appears to be a tightly circumcised penis pointing downward. Just a violent desexualized half Eunuch fromwhat i can see
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.