You've totally missed point. It's about *all* cutting of *all* children. Why group yourself off? It was me that jumped into thread.I do it a lot.Not because of "whatabout",but because cutting kids is cutting kids. It will only stop when u include all. Why do so many not get that?
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @mrkhtake2 @peaceniky and
I defo didn't lol. You've proved my point. I defo say it's all linked. I defo said this isn't whataboutery. I defo make the point cutting boys enabled cutting of girls.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @mrkhtake2 @peaceniky and
Why are you proving my point lol. You're seeing what you want to see. You're strawmanning and intentionally missing the point.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @mrkhtake2 @peaceniky and
Again, no. Again it's to make point that girls will be cut while boys are still cut. If it was "whatabout" I wouldn't care about girls being cut, as many people who are outspoken about FGM don't care about MGM. I care about all cutting and realise one doesn't stop without other
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @mrkhtake2 @peaceniky and
No. Again that's a strawman. But when you cut boys, it gives an argument to those that want to cut girls. Some FGM is equivalent or even not as extreme as MGM. But all FGM must stop. All cutting must stop.They're linked.If we refuse to acknowledge that, all cutting will continue
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Why distinguish?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.