Bro, "trickle down housing" is the status quo that y'all just helped keep in place. Barely any new housing built since the 1950s, all passed down by inheritance with Prop 13 tax breaks, and the rest of us rent their garages until they cash out and retire and it trickles to us.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
More public housing is discussed all the time and is necessary. But if you actually tried to build a significant amount in good locations, the reactionary homeowners that DSA has now allied thenselves with would shriek to high heaven.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
They aren't outnumbered. They were the ones who won the day yesterday-- the Beverly Hills mayor, the Twitter trolls from Marin, etc. They will destroy any serious plan for density, whether public or private. You're carrying water for them.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @cat_guy_steve @dillonliam
Instead of letting middle class CA families buy some new condos, you decided that it is public housing for us, or nothing for anybody. You are in a race to the bottom, manipulated by rich home owners. Think about it. Public housing is not mutually exclusive with new housing.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I don’t make anywhere near that and I bought a condo in SF. On the other hand, if you’re talking about older houses in Forest Hill, which your organization has helped to preserve by killing SB 827, then you’re right on the money.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Not as well as Forest Hill homeowners sitting on $2 million of equity.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.