Theo: "Firefox is amorphous peace of junk. It has no inherent security in it, let alone privilege separation"https://youtu.be/fYgG0ds2_UQ?t=29m56s …
-
-
Is it productive to call a thing people work very hard on "piece of junk"? Is that necessary to raise awareness about the flaws in Firefox?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This is Theo being Theo. I don’t vouch for the words, but it’s useful to have one more authority making the underlying point.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
If Mozilla manage to keep their business working, great things might come from the adoption of Rust when it comes to security.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I agree, but that all-Rust secure browser is not the Firefox that end-users are choosing as a “more secure” alternative to Chrome today.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I support what Mozilla is doing but cannot tacitly support the bad decision to adopt current Firefox over Chrome for security.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
For end-users, it doesn’t matter what advantages Chrome has or how hard Firefox team works. What matters, EXCLUSIVELY, is the end result.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Theo was making an incorrect point about architecture, not about end users.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.