Theo: "Firefox is amorphous peace of junk. It has no inherent security in it, let alone privilege separation"https://youtu.be/fYgG0ds2_UQ?t=29m56s …
-
-
Is it productive to call a thing people work very hard on "piece of junk"? Is that necessary to raise awareness about the flaws in Firefox?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Lots of people work hard on junk code :) The point was that the code is old and didn’t use privsep vs Chrome that was designed for it.
3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
That's why we shouldn't call it junk. Because of the people! I would rather understand the specific flaws than a hyperbolic junk.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I understand that there are feelings involved, but sometimes it’s productive to call junk code junk. Especially if this is Theo :)
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
It's not productive to say wrong things.
10:39 PM - 7 Oct 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.