@steveklabnik you’ve read this right? http://people.csail.mit.edu/nickolai/papers/wang-stack.pdf … compilers removing security-check code “because it can’t happen”?
@nzkoz @steveklabnik It's not the same as that bug because "++x" actually promotes to int, so it can never overflow.
-
-
@pcwalton@steveklabnik sure, I was just replying to Steve's stream of "compiler bugs are scary" not that in particular ;)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.