For big projects, especially open source ones, modularity isn't just good engineering practice. It significantly increases the chance of success of a project, because even if the overall project isn't popular subcomponents can be.
-
-
would the Itanium stakeholders consider this a "success"? :)
-
Probably not, but it's more of a success than all of the compiler work going to waste!
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If only Itanium C++ mangling wasn't absolutely horrible, and also underspecified in ways that are handled divergently by the LLVM and gcc camps :-(https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/68 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The Itanium ABI also has lots of mistakes that were regressions from the preexisting GCC ABI that would have been the de facto standard if a few ppl hadn't pushed to switch...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
See also: Java. I’m not sure these are really an argument for modularity, though, but rather more that it’s legitimate to try to re-solve “solved” problems as a part of other big umbrella projects.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wish
@ChromiumDev did same. The views and aura frameworks are poorly documented and totally unusable except with chromiumThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.