Parallel rustc is very exciting! (Thanks to @SimonSapin for making these measurements!)
See: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/help-test-parallel-rustc/11503 …pic.twitter.com/6OuNeuoZIk
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
Arguably, it does because it *has* to. Because at the same number of lines of code, C++ is still way faster to compile. Take Firefox, for example. Rust is less than 10% of the code base but I'm sure it's well over 20% of the CPU time (and I'm not even talking about wall time).
I would like to figure out why that is. I think some of it may be that Rust code tends to be more dense line-for-line (i.e. each line of Rust corresponds to more machine code than each line of C++). This could probably be experimentally measured.
Writing your compiler in a usable language helps. 
That rustc moves so quickly is part of what excites me about Rust
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.