Go has GC and Rust doesn't. If you were to design an explicitly C-like language with memory safety and without GC, it would look a lot more like Rust than Go. The idea that Rust was designed by a bunch of C++ fans is absurd. Most of us were ML fans more than anything.https://twitter.com/Pessimizations/status/1154473316952023040 …
-
-
It's definitely exploitable. The chance of a successful exploit is likely very low in most cases, but an exploit can be targeted at a fleet of devices and even a 1/10000 chance of success is a massive problem. In many cases, there's process respawning allowing repeated attempts.
-
A failed attempt is going to trigger a panic, not a direct crash, so the Go program handling the panic and trying again or accepting more requests (depending on the environment) is also good enough to make it reliable for exploiting a specific host, which isn't always the goal.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
