gcc inline asm syntax is the worst system except for none of the othershttps://twitter.com/isislovecruft/status/1153422601664049152 …
Also as I recall you can say things like “mov rax,[rbx+rbx+rbx+rbx]” and it’ll assemble to “mov rax,qword ptr [4*rbx]”…it has some sort of symbolic engine in there
-
-
... but why? =)
-
Because someone in the 80s had too much time on their hands I guess
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Also symbol names are typed, so `mov rax, [butts]` is a different instruction depending on whether you declared `butts` with db/dw/dd/dq
-
Not gonna lie, that’s kind of awesome
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.