For whatever reason it seems a fairly pervasive opinion that an additional 3 lines of error handling boilerplate per function call is more readable somehow: https://old.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/c9qj8j/one_of_rusts_designers_on_going_from_explicit/et3bzu7/ …
-
-
- 18 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
not a Go fan or an avid Rust user, but if you pardon my bluntness, those strong opinions don’t really amount to much? readability is probably the only thing Go debatably does better than Rust, and every time I try to get into the language the syntax is the wall I hit
-
Readability =\= familiarity to a C programmer. Once you *do* learn rust syntax and get used to it I would say it’s one of if not the most readable languages because of things like try/?, everything is an expression, FP constructs on iterators, etc.
- 13 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Readability is code for “we do manual type inference and static analysis” on code before commit ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Question mark in Rust us amazing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A bit similar to redux in javascript. So many visual noise in the name of "simplicity".
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm coining Patrick's law: For every exceptionally stupid opinion, there will be a Go dev espousing it.
-
Strike the 'Go'. There are stupid opinions held by many people, and writing code in this or that programming language doesn't inoculate against that. I'm not even sure if *I* might be host to some stupid opinions.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.