Well, sure, but we are actually trying to prove things :)
-
-
I have a basic bias against people calling things 'solved problems'. Until things are simple, easy, easy to compile, reuse, fast, work everywhere, they aren't solved. And we need reimplementations/reimaginings to fix it.
-
Just like Rust reimagined C++, vector graphics, HTML, UI, all is up for reimagining if we can decomplect, outperform, and just plain make things more rapidly workable.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This goes back to the issue about evaluation. Rust is great because it's safe, low-level, and people actually can produce real software in it. But how do you evaluate that third part before it gets adoption? It's a hard problem.
-
it's not hard, you keep an open mind and don't buy into gatekeeping bullshit like reviewers at top conferences often do
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
and you can find much larger, more systemic examples of this. in psychology the Skinner mob, string theorists in physics, the non-probabilistic AI folks, etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.