Every time I see another poll about the @rustlang async/await syntax, I feel like it's missing the option "I just want async/await to be stable and will defer to the Rust Core team's best judgment about the syntax"
-
-
Yes, but the reason async await are wanted is not to avoid allocation, it's to avoid context switching and for c10k. (The reason they're wanted over futures is that future chaining is annoying)
-
Doesn’t context switching always happen anyway when you receive data on a socket?
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
It’s clearly worded pejoratively and does not at all capture the considerations in moving forward with async/await. Brian Smith’s comment is rude, wrong, and ignorant.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.