I doubt it, otherwise you wouldn't be able to use it on existing code
-
-
-
it seems more like a "best effort" thing, to make your code safer but not Rust-level safe.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
No. They want to detect most/common lifetime mistakes. They *don't* intend to find *all* lifetime bugs. That's what I got from Herb Sutter's "update talk" on lifetime safety.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
https://herbsutter.com/2018/09/20/lifetime-profile-v1-0-posted/ … "It aims to detect common local cases of dangling pointers/iterators/string_views/spans/etc. in C++ code, at compile time, efficiently enough to run during normal compilation and in IDE tooltips"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I guess, except for the list of exceptions mentioned in Addendum 12 to 3278.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.